Maxime Morge's Publications
• Sorted by Date • Classified by Publication Type • Classified by Research Category • Classified by Funding Source •
Collective Decision making process to compose divergent interests and perspectives
Maxime Morge. Collective Decision making process to compose divergent interests and perspectives. Special issue of Artificial Intelligence and Law on Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 75–92, Jan. 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9008-y
Download
Abstract
We propose in this paper DIAL, a framework for inter-agents dialogue, which formalize a collective decision-making process to compose divergent interests and perspectives. This framework bounds a dialectics system in which argumentative agents play and arbitrate to reach an agreement. For this purpose, we propose an argumentation-based reasoning to manage the conflicts between arguments having different strengths for different agents. Moreover, we propose a model of argumentative agents which justify the hypothesis to which they commit and take into account the commitments of their interlocutors according to their reputations. In the scope of our dialectics system, a third agent is responsible of the final decision outcome which is taken by resolving the conflict between two players according to their competences and the advanced arguments.
BibTeX
@Article{morge06ail,
author = {Maxime Morge},
title = {Collective Decision making process to compose divergent
interests and perspectives},
journal = {Special issue of Artificial Intelligence and Law on Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence and Law},
year = {2006},
pages = {75-92},
month = {Jan.},
note = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9008-y},
abstract= {We propose in this paper DIAL, a framework for
inter-agents dialogue, which formalize a collective
decision-making process to compose divergent interests
and perspectives. This framework bounds a dialectics
system in which argumentative agents play and arbitrate
to reach an agreement. For this purpose, we propose an
argumentation-based reasoning to manage the conflicts
between arguments having different strengths for
different agents. Moreover, we propose a model of
argumentative agents which justify the hypothesis to
which they commit and take into account the commitments
of their interlocutors according to their reputations. In
the scope of our dialectics system, a third agent is
responsible of the final decision outcome which is taken
by resolving the conflict between two players according
to their competences and the advanced arguments.},
bib2html_pubtype = {International journal},
bib2html_rescat = {MAS, Argumentation, Dialogue},
bib2html_funding = {ADNT}
}
Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Wed Feb 27, 2013 15:12:12