Maxime Morge's Publications

Sorted by DateClassified by Publication TypeClassified by Research CategoryClassified by Funding Source

A formal framework for inter-agents dialogue to reach an agreement about a representation

Maxime Morge, Yann Secq, Jean-Christophe Routier, and Philippe Mathieu. A formal framework for inter-agents dialogue to reach an agreement about a representation. In Proc. of the 6th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument(CNMA), pp. 1–6, August 2006.

Download

[PDF]117.2kB  

Abstract

We propose in this paper a framework for inter-agents dialogue to reach an agreement, which formalize a debate in which the divergent representations are discussed. For this purpose, we propose an argumentation-based representation framework which manages the conflicts between claims with different relevances for different audiences to compute their acceptance. Moreover, we propose a model for the reasoning of agents where they justify the claims to which they commit and take into account the claims of their interlocutors. This framework bounds a dialectics system in which agents play a dialogue to reach an agreement about a conflict of representation.

BibTeX

@InProceedings{morge06cnma,
  author =       {Maxime Morge and Yann Secq and Jean-Christophe Routier and Philippe Mathieu},
  title =        {A formal framework for inter-agents dialogue to reach an
  agreement about a representation},
  booktitle = {Proc. of the 6th Workshop on Computational Models of
        Natural Argument(CNMA)},
  adress = {Riva del Garda},
  pages =        {1-6},
  year =         {2006},
  month =        {August},
  abstract={We propose in this paper a framework for inter-agents dialogue
                  to reach an agreement, which formalize a debate in which
                  the divergent representations are discussed. For this
                  purpose, we propose an argumentation-based representation
                  framework which manages the conflicts between claims with
                  different relevances for different audiences to compute
                  their acceptance. Moreover, we propose a model for the
                  reasoning of agents where they justify the claims to
                  which they commit and take into account the claims of
                  their interlocutors.  This framework bounds a dialectics
                  system in which agents play a dialogue to reach an
                  agreement about a conflict of representation.},
  bib2html_pubtype = {workshop},
  bib2html_rescat = {MAS, Argumentation, Ontology},
  bib2html_funding = {CPER TAC}
}

Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:40:17