Maxime Morge's Publications

Sorted by DateClassified by Publication TypeClassified by Research CategoryClassified by Funding Source

Arguing over motivations (extended abstract)

Maxime Morge and Paolo Mancarella. Arguing over motivations (extended abstract). In Proc. of Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN), pp. 84–87, 2010.

Download

[PDF]75.7kB  

Abstract

Logical models of arguments can be used to encompass the reasoning of agents engaged in negotiations. Such agents can consider multiple motivations which may not be fulfilled all together by an agreement. Thus, high-ranked goals must be preferred to low-ranked goals on which agents can concede. In this paper we propose an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of argumentation, we propose here an argumentation framework in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are defined as tree-like structures. In order to compute our framework, we provide the mechanism allowing to relax the preferences. In this way, our framework suggests some decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice.

BibTeX

@InProceedings{morge10gdn,
  author =       {Maxime Morge and Paolo Mancarella},
  title =        {Arguing over motivations (extended abstract)},
  booktitle =    {Proc. of Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN)},
  pages =        {84-87},
  year =         {2010},
  editor =       {Gert-Jan de Vreede},
  isbn = {9789056382360},
  abstract=      {Logical models of arguments can be used to encompass the
                  reasoning of agents engaged in negotiations. Such agents
                  can consider multiple motivations which may not be
                  fulfilled all together by an agreement. Thus, high-ranked
                  goals must be preferred to low-ranked goals on which
                  agents can concede. In this paper we propose an
                  argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to
                  concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of
                  argumentation, we propose here an argumentation framework
                  in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are
                  defined as tree-like structures. In order to compute our
                  framework, we provide the mechanism allowing to relax the
                  preferences. In this way, our framework suggests some
                  decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible
                  explanation of this choice.},
  bib2html_pubtype = {Workshop},
  bib2html_rescat = {MAS, Argumentation, Agent decision-making},
  bib2html_funding = {ArgUGRID}
}

Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Wed Feb 27, 2013 15:12:13