Maxime Morge's Publications
• Sorted by Date • Classified by Publication Type • Classified by Research Category • Classified by Funding Source •
Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
Maxime Morge. Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System. In Chiang Jao, editor, Efficient Decision Support Systems - Practice and Challenges From Current to Future, pp. 211–240, InTech, September 2011.
Download
Abstract
Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this paper we describe an application based on an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of argumentation, we propose an argumentation framework in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are defined as tree-like structures. Our framework is equipped with a computational counterpart for solving a decision problem, modeling the intuition that high-ranked goals are preferred to low-ranked goals which can be withdrawn. In this way, our framework suggests some decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice. Our implementation, called MARGO, has been used for service selection within the ARGUGRID project. We illustrate our approach with an industrial application, and illustrate the operation of the system with a running example.
BibTeX
@InCollection{morge11intech,
author = {Maxime Morge},
editor = {Chiang Jao},
title = {Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an
Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System},
booktitle = {Efficient Decision Support Systems - Practice and
Challenges From Current to Future},
pages = {211-240},
publisher = {InTech},
chapter = {12},
month = {September},
year = {2011},
isbn = {978-953-307-326-2},
url = {http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/arguing-over-goals-for-negotiation-adopting-an-assumption-based-argumentation-decision-support-syste},
abstract= {Computational models of argumentation has been put
forward as a promising approach to support decision
making. In this context several recent works have
proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision
making. In this paper we describe an application based
on an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making
to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of
argumentation, we propose an argumentation framework in
which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are
defined as tree-like structures. Our framework is
equipped with a computational counterpart for solving a
decision problem, modeling the intuition that high-ranked
goals are preferred to low-ranked goals which can be
withdrawn. In this way, our framework suggests some
decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible
explanation of this choice. Our implementation, called
MARGO, has been used for service selection within the
ARGUGRID project. We illustrate our approach with an
industrial application, and illustrate the operation of
the system with a running example.},
bib2html_pubtype = {Chapter in Book},
bib2html_rescat = {MAS, Argumentation, Agent decision-making},
bib2html_funding = {ArguGRID}
}
Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:40:17