Maxime Morge's Publications
• Sorted by Date • Classified by Publication Type • Classified by Research Category • Classified by Funding Source •
Multiparty Argumentation Game for Consensual Expansion
Stefano Bromuri and Maxime Morge. Multiparty Argumentation Game for Consensual Expansion. In Proceedings of the fifth International Conference onAgents and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 160–165, 1, INSTICC Press, 2013.
Download
Abstract
We consider here a set of agents, each of them having her own argumentation. Arguments and conflicts between them are subjective. The aim of each agent is to enrich her argumentation by taking into account the arguments and conflicts of the other agents. We adopt here an individual-based approach where the cross-fertilization of argumentations emerge from the interactions between the agents. For this purpose, we formalize a multi-party argumentation game using Event Calculus. At the end of the game, each agent extends its argumentation by using the arguments exchanged and the conflicts shared. As we show formally, such an expansion is consensual. By adopting an individual-based approach, our model is explanatory since it highlights the conflicts between the agents.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{morge13icaart,
title = {Multiparty Argumentation Game for Consensual Expansion},
author = {Bromuri, Stefano and Morge, Maxime},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on
Agents and Artificial Intelligence},
editor = {Joaquim Filipe and Ana Fred},
pages = {160-165},
volume ={1}
year = {2013},
publisher = {INSTICC Press},
abstract = {We consider here a set of agents, each of them having her
own argumentation. Arguments and conflicts between them are
subjective. The aim of each agent is to enrich her argumentation by
taking into account the arguments and conflicts of the other
agents. We adopt here an individual-based approach where the
cross-fertilization of argumentations emerge from the interactions
between the agents. For this purpose, we formalize a multi-party
argumentation game using Event Calculus. At the end of the game,
each agent extends its argumentation by using the arguments
exchanged and the conflicts shared. As we show formally, such an
expansion is consensual. By adopting an individual-based approach,
our model is explanatory since it highlights the conflicts between
the agents.},
bib2html_pubtype = {International Conference},
bib2html_rescat = {MAS, Dialogue, Argumentation},
bib2html_funding = {}
}
Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Wed Feb 27, 2013 15:12:13